Finding The Right Chicago Workers Comp Attorney

A Chicago workers comp attorney could assist you if you have been injured on duty. Chicago, the house of the Stanley Mug Champion Blackhawks, has nearly 8 thousand individuals in the metro location. In truth, Chicago is the third most populated city in the Usa. You could locate the best workers comp attorney amongst so several people, but you need the best suggestions.

Chicago workers comp attorney – what you have to understand

Employees are safeguarded by a series of laws that regulate what occurs if they are included in a work environment collision. They will get taken care of monetary awards if they are injured or turned off while doing their work; lawsuits is not required in these cases. Relative are typically covered by workers comp laws in instance an injury leaves the single employed household participant hurt. Fellow workers and companies are also safeguarded because several of these laws restrict the quantity of compensation a worker can obtain from companies, and they also restrict the liability of their fellow workers, in a lot of instances. Work laws establish this structure in state laws. Federal workers in the non-military field are shielded by the FECA (Federal Employment Compensation Act), and most of its guidelines are typical of the compensation laws of a lot of workers. Seamen get defense from the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act).

Where to seek the best attorney

A workers comp attorney has to be spoken to if your insurance firm is refuting your case, or you are not obtaining the clinical therapy that you have to receive, or your licensed snacking physician has purchased surgery or examinations yet you are not getting them. You additionally need the help of a workers comp attorney if you could not work and your employer is not paying you. It is an excellent concept to contact a Chicago workers comp attorney promptly, despite exactly how well your company is snacking you.

There are a lot of issues that turn up when someone is injured on duty. It is a good idea to select an attorney that has a tested performance history of successfully getting compensation for various other damaged workers. Co-workers, family members and good friends will aid you get the best lawyers for these scenarios. They will tell you regarding the lawyers they enjoy with and considerably more. Effort unions will certainly make workers as well. A Chicago workers comp attorney will certainly supply you an initial appointment free. They will also take your instance in a “backup fee” basis, meanings that they will obtain their cash as a percentage of a winning case. Simply puts, they just earn if you do.

Workers compensation commission

You should submit a claim to the workers compensation commission of your state if your company does not want to sue to his/her insurance firm. You likewise should employ a Chicago workers comp attorney to deal with this challenging process. The workers compensation payment of your state has the power to award negotiations for these types of circumstances. You will certainly not need to shell out a great deal of money to your attorney due to the fact that state laws limit the quantity of cash they can ask for in these situations. Most of the times, lawyers rise to 33 % of an ultimate award as their fee in the United States, however this portion differs from area to area. State statutes are produced to manage exactly what an attorney might charge in these cases, yet government approval may be required too. In your scenario, a workers comp attorney will take into account aspects such as loss of wages, health care expenses, and others to obtain you the most cash for your case.

A Chicago workers comp attorney is essential, and you should know a bit concerning the policies in your state for these situations. The workers ‘compensation commission of your state is the most vital government workplace you should visit, and they award negotiations in these compensation situations.

Immigration Bonds Are Here To Help Migrants

Immigration bonds are not frequently talked about when it comes to bail bonds. If you are not an immigrant, then you will not need this form of specialized bond nor a bail bond agency that specializes in immigration. If you are a natural citizen, then you will not need the services of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS, to help bail you out of a problem.

Immigration bonds are issued by the Department of Immigration and Naturalization Service to bail bond agents who specialize and are licensed to bond out immigrants to the United States. It is not just any old license.

It is one that is specially given out by the INS for a bail agency that knows the inner workings and risks associated with immigrants. Studies have shown that immigrants from certain countries are more likely to run and force a bail enforcement agent to try to track them down.

There are two ways a bond is posted. The first is a cash bond in which the immigrant puts up the entire amount in cash him or herself. The second is through a bail agency that will guarantee the bond but requires a percentage of the bond as their fee.

The higher the risk of running, the larger the bond will be and thus the percentage, which is non-refundable, will be higher as well. As long as the immigrant shows up to the court on the designated day there will be no problems.

There is one note that needs attention when dealing with the INS. Just because an immigrant is arrested does not mean they will automatically be deported back to their home country. It depends largely on the degree of crime and whether or not they are in the United States legally.

Chances are pretty high that if they are here illegally, they will be deported back to their home country. Just as with American citizens, immigrants are innocent until proven guilty.

Since immigration bonds are a specialized form of bond, it takes a person familiar with the laws of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in order to write the bond. The INS can point the immigrant towards agencies and attorneys who are familiar with these laws and who can help them out if they find themselves in trouble with the law.

It does not have to be a fruitless endeavor of hunting and searching. That is why the INS is a perfect place to begin the search. They help immigrants get the help they need in order to be tried fairly.

Visit Mike Selvon portal to learn more about the immigration bonds. Your feedback is much appreciated at our bail bond services blog where a free gift awaits you.

Citizenship and Immigration

For many Americans, their U.S. citizenship issued at birth is something they dont think twice about. But for applying immigrants, citizenship is a serious goal.

Hopefully most American natural born citizens understand that citizenship is one of the most greatly desired gifts this countrys government can bestow on its citizens. For those of us who have not had to go through the process of becoming a U.S Citizen apart from being naturally born here, there is only one other way to become U.S. citizens and that is by the often times-lengthy process of what is known as “naturalization”.

Naturalization can often times be a complicated process so you should consult with an immigration lawyer rather than attempting this yourself. Even something as simple as travel within the country or state is something that a person needs to know the rules about and this is where an Immigration lawyer is needed so that you have someone to ask questions such as “How long does it take for USCIS to issue work permission and travel permission?” or “When should I renew my work and travel permission?”

Learning about your new country and its rights and the responsibilities that accompany citizenship is an important part of being a good citizen and at the USCIS and the Office of Citizenship they have developed a great amount of resources and a variety of educational materials that allow immigrants to learn more about U.S. history and government as they prepare for the naturalization test.

A final thought on the naturalization process; in addition to finding good counsel and being represented by an immigration lawyer, there are general requirements that the USCIS will look for by those who look to make our great country their home, to name just a few: good moral character, a knowledge and understanding of U.S. history and government, and favorable disposition toward the United States.

Islamic Divorce in New York State

Muslims residing in the State of New York are in a dual situation when it comes to the implementation of family law. On one hand, they are governed by the religious law of Islam, known as Islamic sharia, and on the other hand, the secular family law of the state of New York. To Muslims, the family law of Islam mandates that marriage and divorce among Muslims should be done in accordance with the Islamic sharia, regardless of whether they live in an Islamic or secular country. Civil divorce decrees obtained by secular courts are not recognized by Islamic sharia.

Under Islamic law, a Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, whereas a Muslim woman is prohibited from marrying non-Muslim man. Under these rules, a non-Muslim woman marrying a Muslim man in compliance with Islamic sharia is subject to the rules of Islam in the areas of divorce, child custody and inheritance. In other words, a non-Muslim woman who gets married to a Muslim man in accordance with Islamic sharia, loses custody of her children in case of divorce, or in case the husband dies. Consequently, a non-Muslim woman marrying to a Muslim man is forced, under the rules of Islamic sharia, to surrender custody of her son when he reaches the age of seven, and her daughter at the age of nine. She also prohibited from inheritance. These rules are applied throughout Muslim countries with a system of sharia-based family law in place.

Marriage Contracts in Islamic Sharia
Under the rules of Islamic sharia, the marriage contract should include: (1) names and addresses of the couple; (2) name of the guardian of the bride; (3) names and addresses of two male witnesses; and (4) the amount of mahr, or a promise of money or its equivalent to be given by the husband to the bride. Like any other civil contracts, Islamic marriage contract should be in the form of offer and acceptance by the parties.

Contrary to the popular notion that mahr is dowry; it is not. A dowry is what the wife contributes to her marriage while mahr is an obligation on the husband to pay his future bride. Others call it a gift; it is not a gift either, because mahr is an obligation on the husband and is mandated by the Quran. The Quran calls it sadaq (Quran 4:4). If no stipulation of mahr is provided in the marriage contract, the marriage remains legal and in effect; in such a situation, the “qadi” (judge) will determine the amount of mahr, which remains a property of the wife alone. The amount of mahr can be paid partially: up-front (Arabic, muqaddam), and deferred until divorce or death of the husband (Arabic, muakhar), or it may be prepaid in full before the consummation of the marriage.

Legal Status of the Mahr Provision in Islamic Law
The most important feature of the mahr provision is that one party makes an offer and the other can accept or refuse to accept. It is a financial settlement between the couple in case a divorce occurs or the husband dies. Although, Muslim women do not personally bargain for the mahr agreements, and, in almost all of the divorce cases that I have seen so far, in the Middle East, Europe and the United States, Islamic marriage agreements involving mahr are negotiated by the representative (Arabic Wali) of the bride.

In the State of New York, an Islamic marriage contract involving mahr may be considered premarital agreement for a divorce settlement. In legal terms, this is called a concurrence of wills or meeting of the minds of the future husband and his future wife. This also means that each party from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their acceptance, and a contract was formed when both parties met such a requirement.

The basic rule is that a premarital contract will be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the law of the state in which it was entered into. Thus an Islamic marriage contract signed in Egypt according to the Egyptian law for example, must be interpreted according to the law of Egypt. The Restatement of the Law Second Conflict of Laws 3d, Chapter 8, Contracts, is clear about the law for the state chosen by the parties to a contract. The text of the Restatement reads: “(1) The law of the state chosen by the parties to govern their contractual rights and duties will be applied if the particular issues is one which the parties could have resolved by an explicit provision in their agreement directed to that issue.”

Looking at both academic and case studies in this area of law, this article points the reader in the direction of the current trends in the treatment of mahr in New York State and to address Islamic family law issues relevant to New York State law and the working of its legal system. The mahr provision in an Islamic marriage contract has been interpreted differently in other states. For more information on treatment of mahr in other states, the individual should seek legal advice.

Interpretation of the Mahr in New York State
Muslim men and women assert their Islamic legal rights in American family courts; as a result, Islamic sharia governing their marriages and divorces becomes an important and complicated part of the American legal landscape. This leads to a discussion of court cases involving Muslim marriage and divorce litigations in the State of New York, as well as whether New York courts will enforce the terms of Muslim marriage contracts, mainly the mahr provision.

New York courts have jurisdiction over divorce cases within its territory, with specific focus on premarital contract structured in accordance with foreign laws. And, various state courts have found no public policy prohibition in enforcing such agreements. In New York, a mahr agreement may be interpreted within the context of a contractual obligation.

In Aziz v. Aziz, the couple entered into a mahr agreement which required the payment of $5,032, with $32 advanced and $5,000 deferred until divorce. The New York court ruled that the contract conformed to New Yorks contract requirements, and that “its secular terms are enforceable as a contractual obligation, notwithstanding that it was entered into as part of a religious ceremony.” (See Aziz v. Aziz, N.Y.S.2d at 124).

In this case, the husband argued that the mahr agreement provided in the Islamic marriage contract could not be enforced because it was a religious document and was not enforceable as a contract. The wife responded by stating that although the mahr is a religious stipulation; its secular terms can be properly enforced by the court. The court agreed with the wife and ordered the husband to pay the deferred mahr. The court found that the mahr agreement complied with the necessary statutory requirements to be recognized and enforceable as a premarital agreement and held that the secular terms of the mahr agreement were “enforceable as a contractual obligation, notwithstanding that it was entered into as part of a religious ceremony.” The court stated that the mahr agreed to by the couple constituted a secular debt of $5,000 and ordered the husband to fulfill the terms of the agreement.

The case was based entirely on another New York of Appeals case of Avitzur v. Avitzur involving a Jewish Ketubah in which a Jewish woman sued for specific performance to force her ex-husband to appear before a Beth Din (Jewish Court). Under Jewish Law, only a man can grant a divorce, or “Get”. Until he does, the woman cannot remarry within the Jewish faith to anybody. Her children will then be considered illegitimate. In order that a “Get” may be obtained, both husband and wife have to appear before the Beth Din. The husband refused to appear, leaving the woman in a state of marital limbo, making her an “agunah.” The New York Court of Appeals found that the Jewish ketubah constituted a valid premarital agreement that could be enforced despite the religious underpinnings of the agreement.

Conclusion
As the second largest religion, and with the number of Muslims immigrating to the United State on the rise, American courts are more frequently looking into Islamic divorce litigations between Muslim couples. Out of respect to Islamic law and culture, American courts attempt to apply certain provisions from Islamic sharia, such as the mahr contract in divorce cases involving Muslim couples. By doing so, American courts risk involving their arguments with gender and economic inequalities between Muslim men and women, leaving Muslim women destitute. The application of mahr agreements in Islamic divorce in the United States prevents women from exercising their rights to equitable distribution of marital assets upon divorce. If the courts need to extend their respect to Islamic law in divorce situations, they should look into whether the wife had a choice in signing the mahr agreement. Muslim women do not personally bargain for the mahr agreements, and, in almost all of the divorce cases that I have seen so far, in the Middle East, Europe and the United States, the Islamic marriage agreements involving mahr are negotiated by the representative (Arabic Wali) of the bride. Other states do not regard the mahr to be a premarital contract. Individuals seeking information on the treatment of mahr by other states should seek legal advice from a competent attorney.

DISCLAIMER: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

Republishing of this article is hereby granted by the author.

Understanding the Objectives of Criminal Law

Los Angeles is governed by different laws that guide its residents on what they should and shouldn’t do. Any violation of the law is punishable and the degree of punishment depends on the extent of the offense. Severe violations of the law that causes serious damages are categorized under criminal offenses. These are weighed by the jury using the guidelines of criminal laws.

Offenses that fall under criminal law are murder, theft, battery, and sexual abuse. Even aiding and abetting, burglary, and assault are considered criminal offenses in Los Angeles and in most part of United States. Criminal offenses are enforced with corporal punishments in different forms and levels.

Criminal law enforcement is commonly done by -balancing the scales-. This is due to the thinking that criminals have to suffer the same way that their victims did. For example, a murderer deserves to undergo death penalty to balance the scales. This enforcement objective is called retribution.

Another enforcement objective is called deterrence, whether individual or general. Individual deterrence aims to punish the sole offender, while general deterrence aims to punish a greater group of society to discourage others from violating the law. A criminal attorney in los angeles may also be handling a case in which the law enforcers aim to incapacitate the client. Incapacitation is the act of extracting the offender from the society through death penalties or life imprisonment.

A criminal attorney in los angeles may also encounter law enforcers who aim only to rehabilitate the offender. This applies to criminal cases brought about by a certain form of addiction of the offender. There is also another form of enforcement objective called restitution where the only aim is to repair the damage done. These may seem like subtle consequences, yet these cases still need the assistance of criminal lawyers.

A criminal attorney in los angeles handles these cases because of his or her expertise in criminal law. Criminal charges are filed in courts and undergo a long process of stressful court proceedings. Once an accused person is proven guilty, enforcement of criminal law is done for different objectives.

Asbestos Lawsuits in Louisiana

In towns and cities throughout the United States, asbestos lawsuits are increasingly prolific as individuals exposed to asbestos twenty and thirty years ago are today developing and dying from mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a rare and extremely lethal form of cancer, in which malignant cells are found in the protective sac covering most of the bodys internal organs. Mesothelioma, which is caused by exposure to asbestos, takes up to three decades to strike its victims. Those with the greatest risk of developing mesothelioma have worked on jobs where they inhaled asbestos particles, or have been exposed to asbestos dust and fiber in other ways.

Today, a growing number of mesothelioma lawsuits have succeeded in recovering hundreds of millions in compensation for the tens of thousands of mesothelioma victims. Compensation is paid by the companies that make these asbestos products, and enables victims to cover their medical expenses and to be compensated for their pain and suffering.

A current center of concern for asbestos victims is New Orleans. In the post-Katrina era, New Orleans and the entire state of Louisiana is undergoing a boom in construction a business infamous for its use of asbestos products. Post-storm rehabilitations of homes, the related large-scale demolitions, and even just the ubiquitous roofing jobs currently underway are exposing thousands of people to asbestos. Despite these dangers, however, Congress is considering a Bill that would prevent someone who becomes ill with cancer as a result of post-Katrina asbestos exposure from getting financial relief.

The introduction of the Bill is being motivated by calls for tort reform among asbestos-related industries. Financially crippled by increasingly high rewards to asbestos victims, these industries want a cap on their liability. They cite a recent asbestos lawsuit in Louisiana, in which homeowners who purchased asbestos-contaminated fill dirt sued the contractor who sold them the soil, as well as the oil company where the dirt had been removed. Although none of the plaintiffs have yet become sick, a jury awarded them compensatory and punitive damages due to their fear of harm (rather than actual harm). The verdict was upheld by a Louisiana appeals court, which ruled that any exposure to a harmful substance, no matter how slight, justifies a lawsuit.

The new Bill, set for debate by Congress in February, would halt asbestos lawsuits. The Bill is seeking to protect companies with asbestos liability from further lawsuits by paying into a government administered trust fund, which would screen claimants through established medical criteria. Victims would be awarded compensation based on the severity of their illness. The Bill specifically states that the fund would not cover victims of environmental and neighborhood exposure, with the prime example being post-Katrina victims in New Orleans and across Louisiana. The Bill is widely opposed by the medical community, as well as by labor unions and citizens rights activists, particularly in the state of Louisiana.

How To Select Personal Injury Lawyer

If you suffered in a personal injury accident that because of someone else’s fault, you should consult with a lawyer to make a claim and get the compensation you deserved.

However, insurance companies will try all their best to take advantage of you if you should decide to sue, so it is not wise for you to personally meet the insurance company without your lawyer present. An experienced personal injury lawyer will know how to successfully negotiate with the insurance company and handle your case.

Anyway, it is really a time consuming and challenging task to select a proper lawyer for yourself. Here are some important qualities for your reference when selecting your lawyer.

Experience – The most important thing you should think about is the lawyer’s experience. You will never want to hire a green hand in your case. The more case like yours the lawyer experienced, the more successfully your case would be handled. A good lawyer is the one who experienced so many such cases and will know what to do immediately without researching your case or check court decisions. This will save you a lot of time and energy.

Specialization – You should try to find a lawyer who is specializing in handling cases like yours. Experiences are very important but they should be related to your case. Thus, the lawyer will be familiar with your case and he/she will have a well-thought-out plan about how your case should handled, which will largely enhance the chance for your case to be successful. For example, if you were injured in a slip and fall accident, you wouldn’t want a lawyer who is majored in real estate.

Reputation – You should also take the lawyer’s reputation into consideration when trying to find one. The more successful similar cases he/she has handled, the more possible for your case to win. So if a family member or friend can recommend a lawyer that has good work experiences in cases similar to yours, then it is advisable for you to make the appointment to meet the lawyer. Besides, if the lawyer is a member of American Association for Justice (AAJ), that previously was known as the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA), which is the biggest association for personal injury lawyers in the United States, then he/she must have a higher reputation than others.

These tips are just some guidelines for you to select a qualified personal injury lawyer. Remember, the step of selecting your lawyer may be crucial to your case result.

Choosing the right immigration asylum lawyer

When you ask for asylum in the United States of America, you must have a very good reason for doing so. Immigration asylum is generally given to people that have been oppressed by the governments of their own countries, as a result of several reasons ranging from skin colour, sexual orientation, and race to political differences, different views and ideas, and even speaking your mind and standing up for what is right. However, asking for asylum is not enough to get you in the clear. You have to convince the US government that you deserve it, and that you really are persecuted by your government. This is where an immigration asylum lawyer comes handy. That is not easy, and can be quite daunting and difficult if done alone. You don’t have any experience practicing law in the United States, and you certainly don’t know the entire constitution and immigration legislations, not to mention the fact that you might not even be able to speak the language correctly, let alone compile a case and build a strong defence around it. The best chance you have is with an immigration asylum lawyer

by your side. And while you’re at it, why not pick the best one? Picking the best one is a hard thing to do, because each and every one of them will advertise themselves as much as they can as being the best asylum immigration So what you have to do is look beyond the advertising and look at how they actually present themselves. Look at the immigration asylum lawyer’s past work, look at how they express themselves, and look for their confidence in your case. If you feel that a certain immigration asylum lawyer is confident, you will feel confident around them and you will know that together you will have higher chances of success. After you make up your mind, and you chose your immigration asylum lawyer, you have to work with him/her on your case. You have to build a case together, build a solid defences together, compile evidence together, and do everything that is in your power to iron out all the kinks and creases before you go to your interview or court hearing.

What Is The Role Of The Federal Government In Criminal Law

Criminal law is an area of law that is normally reserved to the states. The federal government pursues its own investigations in cases that are primarily interstate criminal operations and often work with the specific states in large investigations, but the federal government prosecution always reigns supreme in any criminal charge. If the federal government deems that a legal issue is solely a jurisdictional responsibility for the state, then the state case normally is allowed to proceed.

If an investigation is extensive across a significant number of state boundaries the charges are then filed in federal district court in the federal judicial offices nearest to the illegal activity. Federal charges are adjudicated by different sentencing and conviction guidelines and the dispensation of punishment is different in terms of probation and parole. Federal sentencing guidelines normally require at least some level of incarcerated punishment, but this is not always the case. In the event that the defendant has had convictions in the past, the eligibility for probation is significantly compromised. There are situations where judges can exercise judicial latitude when the threat to public safety is low. Rarely are cases totally dismissed.

The majority of all criminal convictions are delivered in state courts, primarily because no one lives “federally.” Though the perpetrators are in the United States, everyone has a local state residence also and the prosecuting police agency determines the court of jurisdiction by location of the criminal incident. There are some situations where actions in a state are deemed legal by state statute, but unlawful by federal law. The most common example of this occurrence is the medical marijuana movement across the nation. The Department of Justice is currently initiating a program of prosecuting medical marijuana dispensaries in states that have decriminalized marijuana possession based on medical need, claiming sovereignty over state statute by virtue of the federal contraband status of marijuana possession and sale.

Additionally, prosecution conflicts can occur when federal authorities enter into plea agreements with defendants that preclude any state prosecutions at the lower court level. This can be highly problematic for state judicial systems because these cases often include white-collar corporate crimes where the states would also have the standing to sue the defendant in civil court on behalf of victims in their states who were involved, often unbeknownst to the victim until it is too late.

A primary example of this situation is the current plea arrangement being sought in federal court by a number of banks under prosecution by the Securities Exchange Commission. The agreement being sought by the defendants and the SEC would suppress any consequent inferior state prosecutions and eliminate the civil tort standing of the actual victims of the crime. Federal law is sovereign to state law because of state incorporation to the non-governmental guarantees provided in the U. S. Constitution.

The Importance Of Appointing A Criminal Attorney

Criminal attorneys play a significant role in the justice system of the United States by defending a person who is accused of a crime. Although many people accuse criminal lawyers of helping criminals to escape the breaking law, the criminal defense lawyer helps to protect the rights of the Americans. They attempt to look after a fair trial so that the innocent people are not proven guilty of crime.

A criminal lawyer ensures the fact that the accused are not persecuted for the crimes they didnt commit. His responsibility is to make sure that the accused people are not deprived of their constitutional rights. The attorneys represent the people who are guilty of crimes and this involves representing a person in the court of law or aiding a plea bargain. An appeal takes place when the defendant wants to admit guilt in the hope of getting a lenient sentence. The lawyer talks to the prosecuting attorney and attempts to organize the best possible deal for his client. However, if the defendant doesnt want to plead guilty, the attorney represents him in the trial process.

During the trial, the main aim of the attorney is introducing a reasonable doubt. An individual can be found guilty of a crime, in case the prosecutor convinces the judge that the person is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In case, a defense lawyer introduces doubt, the defendant is found innocent. In order to introduce a doubt, the legal representative may present alternate crime theories of various explanations for what happened. The attorney may cast doubt on the proof of prosecution or for discrediting the witnesses of the prosecution. Moreover, he could prove that some elements of the crime arent meted out. For instance, he could prove that the offender was crazy and didnt have the intention of committing the crime.

Private lawyers and the public defenders are the two main types of criminal legal representatives. A private criminal defense lawyer is paid by the clients and can choose the person he will be representing. On the other hand a public defender works for the court rather than a particular client. A public defender has little choice regarding the cases they take on.

If you have a charge levelled against you, you can appoint a Florida criminal attorneyfor representing your case. The legal representative can help you before your charges are filed through the help of a prosecuting attorney. He helps you to deal with the police or other investigators, carries out his own investigation and presents exculpatory evidence negating the potential charges by the prosecutor. So, appoint a proficient lawyer, when you think that you are being investigated or arrested and resolve your case in a successful way.